Abstract
The Museum of Innocence is an innovative postmodern text that fuses the literary world with the material world outside of the text. Orhan Pamuk did this by establishing a physical museum in Istanbul to complement the text after the novel’s publication in 2008. There is a crossover between the novel and the museum through the narrative of objects represented in the novel and the tangible objects on display in the museum. This paper relies on both affect theory and thing theory to argue that a nuanced aspect of realism is created by Pamuk’s novel coined in this paper as “concretized realism”. This paper argues that Pamuk’s novel translates the feelings and emotions of the protagonist, Kemal Bey, through the objects that are described in the text. These emotions and feelings exist outside the realm of language. They are then translated into emotions and feelings within the world of the museum that visitors experience once they enter and observe the objects on display. Pamuk’s novel and its reliance on the cluster of objects in the text suggest that the objects create affective responses in characters, readers, and visitors alike.
Keywords
affect theory, concretization, realism, thing theory
References
Ahmed, Sara. (2010). ‘Happy objects’. In Melissa Gregg & Gregory Seigworth (eds.), The Affect Theory Reader, 29-51. New York: Duke UP.
https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822393047-001
Berlant, Lauren. (2010). ‘Cruel optimism’. In Melissa Gregg & Gregory Seigworth (eds.), The Affect Theory Reader, 93-117. New York: Duke UP.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822393047-006
Brown, Bill. (2001). ‘Thing theory.’ Critical Inquiry, 28 (1): 1-22.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1344258
Demos, Virginia E. (2019). The Affect Theory of Silvan Tomkins for Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy: Recasting the Essentials. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203835913
Fisk, Gloria. (2018). Orhan Pamuk and the Good of World Literature. New York: Columbia UP. https://doi.org/10.7312/fisk18236
Jakubowski, Zuzanna. (2013). ‘Exhibiting lost love: The relational realism of
things in Orhan Pamuk’s The Museum of Innocence and Leanne Shapton’s Important Artifacts.’ In Dorothee Birke & Stella Butter (eds.), Realism in Contemporary Culture: Theories, Politics, and Medial Configurations, 124-145. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110312911.124
Jameson, Fredric. (2015). The Antinomies of Realism. London: Verso.
Malafouris, Lambros. (2013). How Things Shape the Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mukherjee, Ankhi (2008). ‘The death of the novel and two postcolonial writers.’ Modern Language Quarterly, 69 (4): 533-556.
https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-2008-015
Munteanu, Dana LaCourse. (2020). ‘Poetic fear-related affects and society in Greco-Roman antiquity.’ In Alex Houen (ed.), Affect and Literature, 33-48. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. DOI: 10.1017/9781108339339.002
Pamuk, Orhan. (2009). The Museum of Innocence. New York: Vintage International.
Pamuk, Orhan. (2010). The Naive and Sentimental Novelist. London: Faber and Faber.
Riley, Denise. (2005). Impersonal Passion: Language as Affect. Durham and London: Duke UP. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1134dj2
Shaefer, Donovan O. (2019). The Evolution of Affect Theory. New York: Cambridge UP. DOI:10.1017/9781108765343
Tekgül, Duygu. (2015). ‘Fact, fiction and value in The Museum of Innocence.’ European Journal of Cultural Studies, 19 (4): 387-402.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415592893
Turkkan, Sevinc. (2017). ‘Fiction, screenplay, and The Museum of Innocence.’ In Svenc Turkkan and David Damrosch (eds.), Approaches to Teaching the Works of Orhan Pamuk, 3-12. New York: The Modern Language Association in America.
Wehrs, Donald R. (2017). ‘Introduction: Affect and texts: Contemporary inquiry in historical contexts.’ In Donald R. Wehrs & Thomas Blake (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Affect Studies and Textual Criticism, 1-93. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63303-9_1
Xing, Yin. (2013). ‘The novel as museum: Curating memory in Orhan Pamuk’s The Museum of Innocence.’ Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 54 (2): 198-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2011.555798