Ideological Perspectives in Editorial: A Critical Study of Hallmark Editorial


Abstract

When news and events unfold, people turn to media for information, interpretation and, ultimately, analysis. Newspaper as a print organ of journalism becomes a point of reference especially for the elites. Interestingly, most readers dogmatically agree with newspapers’ views than other media’s because they are largely perceived to be neutral; little do they realise that these newspapers are also ideologically-driven. This paper examines an editorial of Hallmark newspaper using a multi-disciplinary approach of Critical Discourse Analysis as an analytical tool. The analysis established, among others, that editorial as an opinion-cum-identity discourse creates a distinctive “social identity” by positively evaluating the actions and behaviours of the in-group as against the negative evaluation of the out-group.  The paper concludes that newspaper editorials are neither neutral nor objective. They are influenced by relation of power, and ideologically inclined.

Authors

Mohammed Sani Abdullahi-Idiagbon, Ameen Akeem

DOI

Keywords

CDA, ideology, discourse, editorial, Hallmark

References

  1. Abdullahi-Idiagbon, Moh'd Sani. (2010). 'Language use in selected Nigerian presidential election campaign speeches: A critical discourse analysis perspective'. Journal of the Nigeria English Studies Association, 13 (2): 32-47.
  2. Ate, Asan Andrew. (2008). Editorial writing. Lagos: NOUN.
  3. Bloor, Thomas and Meriel Bloor. (2004). The Functional Analysis of English (2nd Ed.). UK: Hodder.
  4. Fairclough, Norman and Ruth Wodak. (1997). 'Critical discourse analysis'. In T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. 2, 258-84 London: Sage.
  5. Hackett, Robert A. and William K Carrol. (2008). Remaking Media: The Struggle to Democratize Public Communication. New York: Routledge.
  6. Hall, Stuart. (1996). 'The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantees'. In D. Morley & K. Chan (eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogue in Cultural Studies. (pp. 25-46). London: Rouledge.
  7. Halliday, Michael. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
  8. Hodge, Robert and Gunther Kress. (1993). Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.
  9. Izadi, Foad (2007). 'A discourse analysis of elite American newspaper editorials'. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 31 (2). Retrieved from http://jci.sagepub.com 23/9/2014
  10. Jaworski, Adam and Dariusz Galasinski. (2002). 'The verbal construction of non-verbal behaviours: British Press reports of President Clinton's grand jury testimony video'. Discourse and Society, 13 (15): 629-649.
  11. Khosravinik, Majid. (2009). 'The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers during the Balkan conflict (1999) and the British general election' (2005). Discourse and Society, 20 (4): 477-498. London: Sage.
  12. Koller, Veronika. (2012). 'How to analyse collective identity in discourse-textual and contextual Parameters'. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 5 (2): 19-38
  13. Kopytowska, Monika. (2012). 'Editorial: Critical perspectives on ideology, identity, and interaction'. Critical Approaches for Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 5 (2) i-xiv (Retrieved from http:iicadand.net/journal).
  14. Lagonikos, Irene Theodosia. (2005). 'Ideology in Editorials: A comparison of selected editorials in English-medium newspapers after September 11'. Unpublished MA thesis. Rhodes University.
  15. Martin, James R. (2009). 'Discourse studies'. In M. A. K Halliday and J. J. Webster (eds.), Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics. (pp.154-165). London: Continuum International.
  16. McLeod, Saul A. (2008). Social Identity Theory. Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/social-identity-theory.html (Retrieved on 28th January, 2014).
  17. Okoro, Nnanyelugo and Ben Agbo. (2003). Writing for the Media Society. Nsukka: Prize Publishers.
  18. Oktar, Liltfiye (2001). 'The ideological organization of representational processes in the presentation of us and them'. Discourse and Society. 12 (3): 313-346
  19. Rahimi, Forough and Mohammad Javad Riasati. (2011). 'Critical discourse analysis: Scrutinizing ideologically-driven discourses'. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1 (16): 107-112.
  20. Thompson, Geoff (2004). Introducing Functional Grammar. (2nd edition). New York: Arnold.
  21. Todoli, Julia , Maria Labarta, and Rosanna Dolori. (2006). 'What is critical discourse analysis?' Quaderns de Filologia. Estudis Linguistics. xi 9-34.
  22. Ukonu, Michael. (2005). Fundamentals of Editorial Writing. Nsukka: Multi-Educational.
  23. van Dijk, Teun. A. (1996). Opinions and Ideologies in Editorials Retrieved from http://www.discourse-in-society.org/editorial.htm 15/2/2015
  24. van Dijk, Teun. A. (1998). Ideology. London: Sage.
  25. van Dijk, Teun. A. (2001). 'Critical discourse analysis'. In D. Schiffrin, D.Tannen, and H.E. Hamilton (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 352-371). Oxford: Blackwell.
  26. Van Leeuwen, Theo. (1996). 'The representation of social actors. In Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard (ed.),' Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, (32- 70). London: Routledge.
  27. Wang, Junling. (2010). 'A Critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama's speeches'. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1 (3), 254-261.
  28. Wodak, Ruth. (2011). 'Critical linguistics and discourse analysis'. In J. Zenkowski, J. O. Ostman & J. Verschurren (ed.), Discursive Pragmatics, (pp.50-70) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.